A COLLECTION OF SOME OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTS & TIDBITS
The American Heart Association journal Circulation of Feb. 16 1999 featured the editorial "Dietary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease" about the 70% reduction in deaths in the study group given omega-3 oil linolenic --added was the daily equivalent of 1 teaspoon of cold pressed flax (linseed) oil or 2 tablespoons of regular canola oil.  From this editorial: "...relatively simple dietary changes achieved greater reductions in risk of all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality ... than any of the cholesterol - lowering studies to date.  This emphasized by the finding that the unprecedented [sic] reduction in CHD was not associated with differences in total cholesterol levels ...". 

Prevention with canola, flax and fish oils doesn't come much cheaper and tastier than that: the omega-3 oils, the most important and rediscovered half of what used to be called vitamin F, omega-6 linoleic acid being the other half. 

Sorry, the AHA didn't allow a hyperlink to this editorial by Dr. Leaf but you'll find some earlier data from the Lyon Diet Heart Study here & here (Circ. Feb. 16 1999: 733-5 & 779-85; Lancet 1994: 1454-9; AmJClNutr; 1995: 1360S-6).

A different 1999 study found a 60% reduction in sudden heart deaths in the high omega-3 oil group when associated with high vitamin E or low trans fat intakes: Am J Cl Nutr.; May 99.

A superb overview of omega-3 benefits but potential dangers of cholesterol lowering [!] omega-6 linoleic (corn, cotton seed, saff- and sunflower and soy oils) is found here: Am J Cl Nutr; Sept '99.  There is in fact a growing consensus that more than about 2 tablespoons per day of polyunsaturated omega-6 "linoleic" may be as harmful as its counter part omega-3 is beneficial (here's a technical reference).  

Omega-6 oil linoleic could well be the most common "vitamin overdose" in Western diets with omega-3 linolenic being the most common "vitamin deficiency".  Time for an oil-change ... to canola, flax/linseed and fish.


 
Vitamin C's best study was probably in the Canadian Medical Association Journal on Sept. 23 1972.  During 102 days in winter, 407 on average 25 year old Canadians got 1 g/day + 3 g/day during the first 3 days of any illness.  An identical group was given dummy pills.  Compared with the vitamin C group, this dummy pill group had 40% more ill people and 58% more doctors visits, and a similar increase in prescription drug use.  Statistically this was highly significant but that aspect of this study (drug use and doctors visits) was never followed up.  It also was never proven wrong by other studies (Ex.: Epidemiology; May '92).

According to these results, 1 g per day of vitamin C with an increase during illness would change the face of everyday medical practice.

The New England Journal of Medicine's editorial Eat Right and Take a Multivitamin reports: "The current evidence suggests that people who take such supplements and their children are healthier." (Dr. G. Oakley from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention talking about "standard" multivitamins with 400 mcg folic acid -NEJM; April 9 '98.)

A major study just reported an ever decreasing cancer risk with multivitamins, showing a 75% reduction after 15 years -AnnIntMed; Oct. 1 '98.  Just like it takes decades to cause cancer, it may take decades of supplementation to prevent it ...

Few have a financial interest in cheap non-patent supplements except you, your family and your insurer but supplements are taxed and no credit is given on insurance premiums.  The bulk retail price for a life-time supply of folic acid --an Alzheimer's disease, cancer, birth defect & artery damaging homocysteine risk reducing vitamin-- is under $10 or 0.02¢ per day (no profit there!).

Multi-level pyramid sales, patented or "special" formulations are rarely cost effective, like Ester-C®, a degraded mix of high-temperature oxidized vitamin C.  Personally I keep my vitamin C cold and un-oxidized.  Eleven years after the patent they still refer to their studies as pilot or preliminary but sell the stuff anyway.  Such practices are bound to give the vitamin industry a bad reputation.  How about patenting a pre-oxidized vitamin E, with metabolites [digested products] !

     Quoting from Ester-C's Oct. 1 1999 website: All of the ... studies are considered to be pilot or preliminary, and although the results suggest a positive result, further studies are necessary to verify these conclusions." As of May '98, the largest reported trial was on only 54 people and lasted 1 day --and there is research backed logic why no effects would be found in longer trials.  Feel like wasting time: here's their US patent 4,822,816.

B3 (niacin) and lecithin counteract negative liver effects of alcohol.
The sex life of over half of American men over 40 is affected by degrees of impotence due to local artery dysfunction, smokers twice as often as nonsmokers.  It's a man's early warning for his entire heart and vascular system (CBS; 60 minutes, Nov. 8 '98). 

In women, the high-alcohol with high-folic acid (B-vitamin, soy, beans, liver) group had a 4.5 times lower cardio death rate than the no alcohol - lowest folic acid group (JAMA; '98-2-4).  A different study found an almost halved cardio risk at the highest intake of nuts, lowering further when a multivitamin or vitamin E supplement was added (BMJ; '98-11-14).
 
Heart-healthy lowering of homocysteine is fast, cheap and easy. The effects of all 4 agents (folic acid, B6, B12 & betaine**) are additional and according to some studies may lead to near 50% reductions in heart, blood vessel & Alzheimer's disease risks (ArchNeur; Nov '98; Here's more on A.D. Even if in real life only half of these reductions can be realized, these would be major health advances (see also JAMA; '97-6-11 & here's the AHA). 

    In addition and for pennies per day, there is zero risk!  Add vitamins C and E, fiber, minerals, omega-3 oils and eat low processed foods** and you'll reduce your statistical chances of early vascular ill health to a fairly low level independently of your genetics.  Homocysteine lowering is especially important for the about one third of us with a genetic tendency to higher levels: 

    For some reason, half of those with heart problems have "desirable" levels of cholesterol.  Could low mineral, antioxidant and homocysteine lowering micronutrients cause that difference --or does your MD, heart specialist or lipidologist [yes, a "blood-fat-specialist"] have a better theory?   Since half of you reading this website are or will suffer from heart and blood vessel diseases, this is a question worth asking. 

--**) Betaine & choline are about 0.5% and 0.25% respectively of wheat bran and wheat germ -leaving refined flour with only about 0.06% (Cereal Chem; 1-'67: 48-60).  Both nutrients have similar vitamin-like roles that are crucial for artery health.  [Choline turns into betaine (-TMG) which turns into "vitamin B15" (-DMG), at each step reducing toxic homocysteine and otherwise protecting your blood fats and liver.] 

    Nutrient information like this is not likely to come from a cardiologist or lipidologist.  For example, the 30 page & 404 references Jan. 21 1999 Consensus Recommendations for Heart Failure from the American College of Cardiology focuses on drugs.  The only mention of any nutrient is: "Physicians should monitor [which is difficult] and correct any deficiencies in potassium and magnesium, since these may cause ... arrhythmias [irregular heart beat] ...". 

  Similarly, a different 1999 consensus panel's Guide to Preventive Cardiology for Woman states: "Diets rich in antioxidant ... nutrients and folate are preferred over supplements." (J Am Coll Cardiol; May 1999: 1751-5).  They don't say why you shouldn't do both.  In fact, folate happens to be a vitamin that is better absorbed from supplements, while vitamin E from food plus your multi won't give you the about 200 IU's linked with a 40% lowered risk of heart disease.

    A caveat about such consensus panels --or websites: as Dr. JRA Mitchell once reported, "What passes for knowledge is often no more than well-organised ignorance." and "The alternative to scientific experiment is the expert committee.  Unfortunately, just as one cannot be sure of the relationship between risk factors and disease, we cannot be sure of the relationship between the opinion of the committee and the truth: the opinion of the committee will depend on who is selected for it." 

The medical treatment principle First, Do No Harm includes First, Try Nutrition.  Nutritional Medicine is also called orthomolecular medicine or psychiatry.  The concept that eating a well balanced diet [whatever that is] provides optimum amounts of all the nutrients you need is based on hope, philosophy or paradigm but not on science.  While a balanced & varied diet with lots of fruits, veggies & whole grains is a superb idea, no one can scientifically say that even such diet has your optimum amounts of selenium, magnesium, calcium, potassium, vanadium, silicon, molybdenum, chromium, vitamins C, E & dozens of other nutrients. 

People don't readily change eating patterns that are based on taste, habit, price, availability, religion and custom.  This, like gravity, being a reality, the taking of a few supplements is the easiest and cheapest thing anyone can do regarding the known nutrients.
 
Selenium is crucial in heart disease and cancer prevention --or put the other way, many heart conditions and cancers are partially selenium deficiency diseases.  Selenium is found in US or Canadian wheat flour at 1 to 120 mcg/100g depending on where it was grown, making it either a good or a terrible source. 

Since 1984, ultra-low selenium and ultra-high heart disease Finland supplements its fertilizers with selenium. Rather than supplementing fertilizer or flour with minerals or vitamins and hoping you'll get optimum nutrients, your chances are much improved with a well targeted vitamin-mineral supplement. Sure, it looks like a pill but it's really a food concentrate. Here's the latest about an ongoing selenium study.

Dog food always contained a vitamin and mineral supplement, even the canned-meats variety.  This lack of an added supplement explains the veterinary dogma that your dinner leftovers are bad for a dog!  Animal science accepted years ago that supplements are an essential food group for dogs, cats, zoo, farm & lab animals. Farm science also proved that supplements are vital to crop health because plants may not get all the nutrients they need from the soil.

Food-pyramids of the various food groups are made by portion size and some relative importance.  On top of these pyramids should be a category of micronutrients & supplements as we are all below optimum in some nutrients because of where we live and what we eat.  In the plant analogy: fertilizers for optimum health ... 

Underdose of nutrients affects most people. The most common deficiencies are protein, iodine, iron, calcium, magnesium, potassium, zinc, selenium & vitamins A, B, C, D, E.  Also often lacking are omega-3 oils (fish -% varies, flax -57%, unhydrogenated regular canola -8%, unhydrogenated soy -7%, wheat germ -5% & unrefined walnut -5%).

Overdose of nutrients -apart from calories, iron, copper and omega-6 linoleic oil- is extremely rare and usually benign.  Prescription drugs however according to a US hospital study daily kill about 300 [a jumbo-jet full of Americans per day] while causing 6000 serious adverse reactions --defined as: permanent disability, hospitalization or causing death (JAMA; '98-4-15)This is 1 U.S. doctor prescribed drug death and 20 serious reactions every 5 minutes!

Daily about 46 Americans die from Aspirin, as many as from AIDS (NEJM; June 17 '99) but a low dose (1/7th of a  500 mg pill/day) is anti-clot heart-healthy and about 160 times more bang for your buck than cholesterol lowering statin drugs (BMJ; Dec. 5 '98).  The combination of Tylenol & alcohol is bad for your liver and should not [Tylenol that is] be sold in bars.  Tylenol alone may damage your kidneys. 
The taking of all suggested supplements (E, C, the B’s, minerals, CoQ10, flax or fish oil + niacin if needed, & throw in a nibble of an Aspirin) is cheaper and most certainly heart-healthier than any one of the cholesterol lowering statin drugs.  After about 50 billion $ in sales, statin makers still can't say they will prolong life for most users, a fact quickly established for niacin (ex: Nutr Rev; Aug. '93: 246-52 and J Am Coll Cardiol; Dec. '86: 1245-55).  Niacin is in fact the only "drug" suggested by the AHA for HDL improvement in "primary prevention" and it is 1 drug out of 3 for LDL reduction. 
 
Statin drugs (Pravachol, Lipitor, Baycol, Zocor, Mevacor, Lescol, ...) make part of the lipid lab report look better and patients poorer but more at ease --and doctors are yet to get blamed for prescribing them. Their limited benefit may well be from effects other than lowering LDL cholesterol, their main sales pitch.

     MOST STATIN FINE-PRINT, including Lipitor's, warns "The effects of ... on cardio vascular morbidity [illness] or mortality [death] or total mortality have not [!] been established."  And: "Significant decreases in circulating ubiquinone [CoQ10] levels in patients treated with X or other statins have been observed.  [And this] ... could lead to impaired cardiac function ..." while "...in some patients the beneficial effects of  lowered ... cholesterol may be partially blunted [sic] by a concomitant increase in Lp(a) levels." (RxMed).  Most ads use similar wording and in smaller print than this one.  Few studies were done on women, the young or the elderly.  Internet ads often omit these warnings.  The FDA stopped many misleading promotions but not yet the 1999 TV ad exclaiming: "Lipitor did it! .. The lower numbers you're looking for."  They're not allowed to say: "The better health you're looking for."

     STATIN UPDATE: From NEngJMed; Dec. 31 '98: "37% of  treated patients had increases in plaque ... despite adequate therapy." "Furthermore, factors other than lipoprotein, such as homocysteine, fibrinogen, ... , and various infectious agents, may also play an important part in the initiation and continued progression of atherosclerosis."   COMMENT: 1.) 37% of patients worsening is failure rather than "adequate therapy"; 2.) Of the 8 cited factors at least 5 are easily improved with supplements.

    MORE: The Journal Club on the Web has two good statin study analysis  here and here: A typical patient would have to be treated for over 200 years at a drug cost alone of over $200 000 to prevent 1 fatal or non-fatal cardiac event.  In one of these famous studies (WOSCOP), 160 000 men were invited, 6600 were selected, half were treated but after 5 years and 30% giving up on the drug, the total death rate was not quite statistically different.  The other study (CARE) found 12 cases of breast cancer in the statin group and only 1 in the placebo group.  One German MD commented in NEJM; 99-4-8:1115 about a 3rd major study (LIPID): Pravastatin has no particular advantage over placebo [a dummy-pill], ... while concluding: Statins are rather fragile props."  Eventually doctors and organizations will get blamed for having endorsed the statin route --the non-patent drug better way is niacin.  Sorry, this section got a little tough but  a "lipidologist" may put you on a statin, so at least know the facts.

     HERE'S THE LATEST: the N Eng J Med. of Aug 12 1999 (page 498-) has a drug treatment review by Dr R. Knopp about blood fat disorders (not yet available on the Internet but if you need some more info for your MD, e-mail this site).  Compare Figures 2 (statins) and 4 (niacin) and keep in mind that at its core, niacin is a cheap essential antioxidant nutrient with a long and proven track record needed for over 200 reactions in the body (covering from heart-health to schizophrenia).  On the other hand, statins are a new multi billion dollar commercial drug that effectively lowers LDL cholesterol --but also the heart-healthy CoQ10 and who knows at else.

The American Heart Association's Nov. '99 website suggests not taking supplements and getting your nutrients only from food.  Among the foods suggested however are water bagels, frankfurter buns, molasses cookies & angel cake

   Lipton's Promise Ultra Fat Free Nonfat Margarine has 3 of the above logos and has "0% fat", zero vitamins B, C, D, E, zero fiber, zero protein, zero calcium, zero etc.  Some Promise, 2 of the 50 nutrients you need: supplemented vitamin A and water. The irony: you shouldn't supplement but Lipton got its endorsement only because they supplement this imitation butter.

   CONSUMER REPORTS of June '98 revealed that these endorsements are sold for $2500 plus a yearly fee and include Frosted Flakes, a processed flake with 42% sugar and only 1 g fiber.  No joke, but no yolk!

   SAWDUST, with over 10% of 1 of only 6 required nutrients --fiber-- would qualify for these endorsements.  They know that about 50 nutrients are needed for human health and the endorsement on the basis of the absence of fat and cholesterol and the presence of only one (1) nutrient is irresponsible.  The AHA, America's most reliable source of heart-health information according to itself, might fortify its endorsement criteria.

    DONATIONS: Until the AHA gets nutrient wise AND puts all donation financed research free on the Internet, Americans might consider donating instead to the nutrition dedicated Linus Pauling Institute (here's their website).  As a second choice --although they spend more on fund raising than on research-- consider the slightly more micro-nutrient friendly American Cancer Society (here's one of their nutrition pages) and stipulate that you want donations to be nutrition related.

Avoiding liver or eggs because they're high in cholesterol may in fact be bad for the heart and blood vessels because they contain protein, lecithin, choline, betaine and B vitamins.  Liver is low in fat and about the highest source of heart-healthy folic acid, B6, B12, choline and most other B vitamins, while its betaine (TriMethylGlycine or TMG) may soon become a heart health food.

    Adelle Davis, America's most celebrated nutritionist according to her publisher, suggested: "...eggs ... should never be restricted in the diets of persons with atherosclerosis."   In the chapter with 170 references about cholesterol problems she advocates the liberal consumption of liver.  Remember, it is now, 30 years later, pretty well unanimously agreed that unoxidized cholesterol is not toxic while oxidized, highly refined, hydrogenated or deep fried --trans-- fats are definitely toxic.  It is also agreed that antioxidants prevent toxic blood fat oxidation.

Nutrient modification by processing is little questioned.  The same is true for the frequent deficiencies of vitamin E, omega-3 & other nutrients in the low fat 'n cholesterol step I & II diets --AmJClNutr; May 99.  Since the addition of folic acid to US & Canadian flour and breakfast cereals in 1998, many such highly processed products are promoted as sources of folic acid --NEJM; May 13 '99.  While partial re-supplementation helps, probably 90% of the world eats non supplemented refined grain and rice products --and nobody replaces the 80 - 100% of removed magnesium, zinc or vitamin E to name but a few lost nutrients.  Low magnesium alone is linked to 11% of U.S. heart mortality (Int. J. Epid; 1999)

More-studies-are-needed is an age-old caveat.  While there will never be certainty, there are sufficient data to send the optimum - health case to the jury with instructions that, in life, a hung jury is not an option.  This website is one such analysis.  Here's one by Nutrition Science News.  Here's an other but technical analysis by >AltMedRev; '96: 132.  Any heart specialist not having read the latter, the Feb. 16 '99 issue of Circulation about omega-3's and McCully's homocysteine book has dangerous information deficiencies.

Carotenoids, of which betacarotene and lycopene are but 2 out of over 600, are best eaten in boiled carrots, tomatoes and their paste and in all deeply colored fruits and veggies.  A little oil makes them more absorbable. Here's some Swiss carotenoid info.

Bone loss (osteoporosis): eat bone.  It is surprising that not all research about low bone density first suggests to eat more bone and/or it's main ingredient, calcium. Think: when your tire has low air density, you give it air.  Lack of vitamin D is also a proven preventable factor in about ½ of all hip fractures --JAMA; '99-4-28.  Similarly, in the case of cartilage loss (osteoarthritis): eat cartilage (also called glucosamine and chondroitin sulfates) and, a lesser source, soft bone itself.  Biochemically not surprisingly, clinical research now links bone and cartilage health with artery health and heart disease survival (Morrison/Schjeide).  P.S. If you can now afford a broken hip or wrist, you could have afforded the daily 1½ g calcium, ¾ g magnesium & 4-800 IU vitamin D to have prevented this fracture --or indeed today's bad back.

People and animals store the types of fat they eat.  Feed chickens flax-seed or fish(!), their eggs go omega-3 (and expensive).  Feed people solid fats (shortening, "partially" hydrogenated or heat-damaged fats) they'll go prematurely stiff; feed them flax and lecithin, they'll go smooth; feed them fish oil, they'll stay fluid.
Eddie's Muesli: 1/3 no-fat yogurt +1/3 fruits (currants, raisins, apple, banana, strawberries, blueberries, cantaloupe, apricot, prune, papaya) + 1/4 whole rye (cook 1 min.) & oat kernels, oat bran & wheat germ (&/or rolled oats or low-fat granola type cereal) + 1/6 lecithin, flax seeds, flax oil, sunflower seeds, Brazil & walnuts (better oil than pecans).  Powdered vitamin C keeps things fresh. Mix in 1 gal. (4 l) container. Let sit for 12 hours.  Refrigerate & eat within 7 days. Good & delicious breakfast and snack food; increase the fruits and you'll get a desert.

Return to menu.