| The American Heart Association
journal Circulation of Feb. 16 1999 featured the editorial "Dietary
Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease" about the 70%
reduction in deaths in the study group given omega-3 oil linolenic
--added
was the daily equivalent of 1 teaspoon of cold pressed flax (linseed)
oil or 2 tablespoons of regular canola oil. From this editorial:
"...relatively simple
dietary changes achieved greater reductions in risk of all-cause and coronary
heart disease mortality ... than any of the
cholesterol - lowering studies to date.
This emphasized by the finding that the unprecedented [sic]
reduction in CHD was not associated with differences in total cholesterol
levels ...".
Prevention with canola, flax and
fish oils doesn't come much cheaper and tastier than that: the omega-3
oils, the most important and rediscovered half of what used to be called
vitamin F, omega-6 linoleic acid being the other half.
Sorry, the AHA didn't allow a hyperlink
to this editorial by Dr. Leaf but you'll find some earlier data from the
Lyon Diet Heart Study
here
& here
(Circ. Feb. 16 1999: 733-5 & 779-85; Lancet 1994: 1454-9;
AmJClNutr;
1995: 1360S-6).
A different
1999 study found a 60% reduction in sudden heart deaths in the high omega-3
oil group when associated with high vitamin E or low
trans
fat intakes: Am
J Cl Nutr.; May 99.
A superb overview of omega-3
benefits but potential dangers of cholesterol lowering [!] omega-6 linoleic
(corn, cotton seed, saff- and sunflower and soy oils) is found here:
Am
J Cl Nutr; Sept '99.
There is in fact a growing consensus that more than about 2 tablespoons
per day of polyunsaturated omega-6 "linoleic" may be as harmful as its
counter part omega-3 is beneficial (here's
a technical reference).
Omega-6 oil
linoleic could well be the most common "vitamin overdose" in Western diets
with omega-3 linolenic being the most common "vitamin deficiency".
Time for an oil-change ... to canola, flax/linseed and fish.
|
| Vitamin C's best study was
probably in the Canadian Medical Association Journal on Sept. 23 1972.
During 102 days in winter, 407 on average 25 year old Canadians got 1 g/day
+ 3 g/day during the first 3 days of any illness. An identical group
was given dummy pills. Compared with the vitamin
C group, this dummy pill group had 40% more ill people and 58% more
doctors visits, and a similar increase in prescription drug use.
Statistically this was highly significant but that aspect of this study
(drug use and doctors visits) was never followed up. It also was
never
proven wrong by other studies (Ex.:
Epidemiology;
May '92).
According to
these results, 1 g per day of vitamin C with an increase during illness
would change the face of everyday medical practice.
|
|
| The New
England Journal of Medicine's editorial Eat
Right and Take a Multivitamin reports: "The
current evidence suggests that people who take such supplements and their
children are healthier." (Dr.
G. Oakley from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention talking about
"standard" multivitamins with 400 mcg folic acid -NEJM;
April
9 '98.)
A major study just reported an
ever decreasing cancer risk with multivitamins, showing a 75% reduction
after 15 years -AnnIntMed;
Oct. 1 '98. Just like it takes decades to cause cancer,
it may take decades of supplementation to prevent it ...
Few have a financial interest
in
cheap non-patent supplements except you, your family and your insurer but
supplements are taxed and no credit is given on insurance premiums.
The bulk retail price for a life-time supply of folic acid --an Alzheimer's
disease, cancer, birth defect & artery
damaging homocysteine risk reducing vitamin-- is under $10 or 0.02¢
per day (no profit there!). |
| Multi-level pyramid sales, patented
or "special" formulations are rarely cost effective, like Ester-C®,
a
degraded mix of high-temperature oxidized vitamin C. Personally I
keep my vitamin C cold and un-oxidized. Eleven years after the patent
they still refer to their studies as pilot or preliminary
but sell the stuff anyway. Such practices are bound to give the vitamin
industry a bad reputation. How about patenting a pre-oxidized vitamin
E, with metabolites [digested products] !
Quoting from Ester-C's Oct. 1 1999 website: All of the ... studies are
considered to be pilot or preliminary, and although the results suggest
a positive result, further studies are necessary to verify these conclusions."
As
of May '98, the largest reported trial was on only 54 people and lasted
1 day --and there is research backed logic why no effects would be found
in longer trials. Feel like wasting time: here's their US patent
4,822,816. |
|
|
| B3 (niacin)
and lecithin counteract negative liver effects of alcohol. |
| The sex
life of over half of American men over 40 is affected by degrees of
impotence due to local artery dysfunction,
smokers twice as often as nonsmokers. It's a man's early warning
for his entire heart and vascular system (CBS; 60 minutes,
Nov. 8 '98).
In women, the high-alcohol with
high-folic acid (B-vitamin, soy, beans, liver)
group had a 4.5 times
lower cardio death rate
than
the no alcohol - lowest folic acid group (JAMA;
'98-2-4). A different study found an almost halved
cardio
risk at the highest intake of nuts, lowering further when a multivitamin
or
vitamin E supplement was added (BMJ;
'98-11-14).
| Heart-healthy lowering of homocysteine
is
fast, cheap and easy. The effects of all 4 agents (folic
acid, B6, B12 & betaine**) are additional
and according to some studies may lead to near 50% reductions in heart,
blood vessel & Alzheimer's disease risks
(ArchNeur;
Nov
'98; Here's
more on A.D.) Even if in real life only half of these
reductions can be realized, these would be major health advances (see
also JAMA; '97-6-11 &
here's
the AHA).
In addition and
for pennies per day, there is zero risk! Add vitamins C and E, fiber,
minerals, omega-3 oils and eat low processed foods**
and you'll reduce your statistical chances of early
vascular ill health to a fairly low level independently of your
genetics. Homocysteine lowering is especially
important for the about one third of us with a genetic tendency
to higher levels:
For some reason, half of those with
heart problems have "desirable" levels of cholesterol. Could low
mineral, antioxidant and homocysteine lowering micronutrients cause that
difference --or does your MD, heart
specialist or lipidologist [yes, a
"blood-fat-specialist"] have a better theory? Since
half of you reading this website are or will suffer from heart and blood
vessel diseases, this is a question worth asking.
--**)
Betaine &
choline are about 0.5% and 0.25% respectively of wheat bran and wheat germ
-leaving refined flour with only about 0.06% (Cereal Chem; 1-'67:
48-60). Both nutrients have similar vitamin-like roles that are crucial
for artery health. [Choline turns into betaine (-TMG) which turns
into "vitamin B15" (-DMG), at each step reducing toxic homocysteine and
otherwise protecting your blood fats and liver.]
Nutrient information like this is not likely
to come from a cardiologist or lipidologist. For example, the 30
page & 404 references Jan. 21 1999 Consensus
Recommendations for Heart Failure from
the American College of Cardiology focuses on drugs. The only
mention of any nutrient is: "Physicians should monitor [which is difficult]
and correct any deficiencies in potassium and magnesium, since these may
cause ... arrhythmias [irregular heart beat] ...".
Similarly,
a different 1999 consensus panel's
Guide
to Preventive Cardiology for Woman states:
"Diets rich in antioxidant ...
nutrients and folate are preferred over supplements." (J Am Coll Cardiol;
May 1999: 1751-5). They don't say why you shouldn't do both.
In fact, folate happens to be a vitamin that is better absorbed
from supplements, while vitamin E from food plus your multi won't
give you the about 200 IU's linked with a 40% lowered risk of heart disease.
A caveat about such consensus panels --or
websites: as Dr. JRA Mitchell once reported, "What passes for knowledge
is often no more than well-organised ignorance." and "The alternative to
scientific experiment is the expert committee. Unfortunately, just
as one cannot be sure of the relationship between risk factors and disease,
we cannot be sure of the relationship between the opinion of the committee
and the truth: the opinion of the committee will depend on who is selected
for it." |
The medical treatment principle
First,
Do No Harm includes First, Try Nutrition.
Nutritional Medicine is also called orthomolecular medicine or psychiatry.
The concept that eating a well balanced diet [whatever that is] provides
optimum amounts of all the nutrients you need is based on hope, philosophy
or paradigm but not on science. While a balanced
&
varied diet with lots of fruits, veggies & whole
grains is a superb idea, no one can scientifically say that even
such diet has your optimum amounts of selenium, magnesium, calcium, potassium,
vanadium, silicon, molybdenum, chromium, vitamins C, E
& dozens of other nutrients.
People don't readily change eating
patterns that are based on taste, habit, price, availability, religion
and custom. This, like gravity, being a reality, the
taking of a few supplements is the easiest and cheapest thing
anyone can do regarding the known nutrients.
| Selenium is
crucial
in heart disease and cancer prevention --or
put the other way, many heart conditions and cancers are partially
selenium deficiency diseases. Selenium is found in US or Canadian
wheat flour at 1 to 120 mcg/100g depending on where it was grown,
making it either a good or a terrible source.
Since 1984, ultra-low
selenium and ultra-high heart disease Finland supplements its fertilizers
with selenium. Rather than supplementing fertilizer or flour with minerals
or vitamins and hoping you'll get optimum nutrients, your chances are much
improved with a well targeted vitamin-mineral supplement.
Sure,
it looks like a pill but it's really a food concentrate. Here's
the latest about an ongoing selenium study. |
Dog food always contained
a vitamin and mineral supplement, even the canned-meats variety.
This lack of an added supplement explains the veterinary dogma that
your dinner leftovers are bad for a dog! Animal science accepted
years ago that supplements are an essential food
group for dogs, cats, zoo, farm & lab
animals. Farm science also proved that supplements are vital to
crop health because plants may not get all the nutrients they need from
the soil.
Food-pyramids of the various
food groups are made by portion size and some relative importance.
On top of these pyramids should be a category of micronutrients
& supplements as we are all below optimum in some nutrients
because of where we live and what we eat. In the plant analogy:
fertilizers
for optimum health ... |
| Underdose of nutrients affects
most people. The most common deficiencies are protein, iodine, iron, calcium,
magnesium, potassium, zinc, selenium & vitamins A, B, C, D, E.
Also often lacking are omega-3 oils (fish -% varies, flax -57%,
unhydrogenated
regular
canola
-8%,
unhydrogenated soy -7%, wheat germ
-5%
& unrefined
walnut -5%).
Overdose of nutrients -apart
from calories, iron, copper and omega-6 linoleic oil- is extremely rare
and usually benign. Prescription drugs however according to a US
hospital study daily kill about
300 [a jumbo-jet full of Americans per day] while causing 6000 serious
adverse reactions --defined as: permanent disability, hospitalization or
causing death (JAMA;
'98-4-15). This
is 1 U.S. doctor prescribed drug death and 20 serious reactions
every 5 minutes! |
|
|
| Daily
about 46 Americans die from Aspirin, as many as from AIDS (NEJM;
June
17 '99) but a low dose (1/7th of a 500
mg pill/day) is anti-clot heart-healthy and about 160 times
more bang for your buck than cholesterol lowering statin drugs (BMJ;
Dec.
5 '98). The combination of Tylenol &
alcohol is bad for your liver and should not [Tylenol
that is] be sold in bars. Tylenol alone may damage
your kidneys. |
|
The taking
of all suggested supplements (E, C, the B’s, minerals, CoQ10,
flax or fish oil + niacin if needed, &
throw in a nibble of an Aspirin) is cheaper and most certainly heart-healthier
than any one of the cholesterol lowering statin
drugs.
After about 50 billion $ in sales, statin makers still can't say they will
prolong life for most users, a fact quickly established for niacin (ex:
Nutr
Rev; Aug. '93: 246-52 and J
Am Coll Cardiol; Dec. '86: 1245-55). Niacin is
in fact the only "drug" suggested by the AHA for HDL improvement in "primary
prevention" and it is 1 drug out of 3 for LDL reduction.
| Statin drugs (Pravachol,
Lipitor, Baycol, Zocor, Mevacor, Lescol, ...) make
part
of the lipid lab report look better and patients poorer but more at ease
--and doctors are yet to get blamed for prescribing them. Their limited
benefit may well be from effects other than lowering LDL cholesterol,
their main sales pitch.
MOST STATIN FINE-PRINT, including
Lipitor's,
warns "The effects of ... on cardio vascular
morbidity [illness] or mortality
[death]
or total mortality
have not [!] been established."
And: "Significant decreases in circulating ubiquinone [CoQ10]
levels
in patients treated with X or other statins have been observed. [And
this] ... could lead to impaired cardiac function
..." while "...in
some patients the beneficial effects of lowered
... cholesterol may be partially blunted [sic]
by a concomitant increase in Lp(a) levels." (RxMed).
Most ads use similar wording and in smaller print than this one.
Few studies were done on women, the young or the elderly. Internet
ads often omit these warnings. The FDA stopped many misleading promotions
but not yet the 1999 TV ad exclaiming: "Lipitor did it! .. The lower
numbers
you're looking for." They're not allowed to say: "The better health
you're looking for."
STATIN UPDATE: From NEngJMed;
Dec. 31 '98: "37% of treated patients had
increases in plaque ... despite adequate therapy." "Furthermore, factors
other than lipoprotein, such as homocysteine, fibrinogen, ... , and various
infectious agents, may also play an important part in the initiation and
continued progression of atherosclerosis."
COMMENT: 1.) 37% of patients worsening is
failure rather than "adequate therapy"; 2.) Of the 8 cited factors at least
5 are easily improved with supplements.
MORE:
The
Journal
Club on the Web has two good statin study
analysis
here
and
here:
A typical patient would have to be treated for over 200 years at a drug
cost alone of over $200 000 to prevent 1 fatal or non-fatal cardiac
event. In one of these famous studies (WOSCOP),
160 000 men were invited, 6600 were selected, half were treated but after
5 years and 30% giving up on the drug, the total death rate was
not
quite statistically different. The other study (CARE)
found 12 cases of breast cancer in the statin group and only 1 in the placebo
group. One German MD commented in NEJM; 99-4-8:1115 about
a 3rd major study (LIPID):
Pravastatin has no particular advantage over placebo [a dummy-pill], ...
while concluding: Statins are rather fragile props." Eventually doctors
and organizations
will get blamed for having endorsed the statin
route --the non-patent drug better way is niacin. Sorry,
this section got a little tough but a "lipidologist" may put you
on a statin, so at least know the facts.
HERE'S THE LATEST: the N Eng J Med.
of Aug 12 1999 (page 498-) has a drug treatment review by Dr R. Knopp about
blood fat disorders (not yet available on the Internet but if you need
some more info for your MD, e-mail this site). Compare Figures 2
(statins) and 4 (niacin) and keep in mind that at its core, niacin
is a cheap essential antioxidant nutrient with a long and proven track
record needed for over 200 reactions in the body
(covering from heart-health to schizophrenia). On the other hand,
statins are a new multi billion dollar commercial drug that effectively
lowers LDL cholesterol --but also the heart-healthy CoQ10 and who knows
at else. |
|
| The American Heart Association's
Nov. '99 website suggests not taking supplements and getting your nutrients
only from food. Among the foods suggested however are water
bagels, frankfurter buns, molasses cookies & angel
cake.
Lipton's
Promise Ultra Fat Free Nonfat
Margarine has 3 of the above logos and
has "0% fat", zero vitamins B, C, D, E, zero fiber, zero protein,
zero calcium, zero etc. Some Promise, 2 of the 50 nutrients
you need: supplemented vitamin A and water. The irony:
you shouldn't
supplement but Lipton got its endorsement only because they supplement
this imitation butter.
CONSUMER
REPORTS of June '98 revealed that
these endorsements are sold for $2500 plus a yearly fee and include Frosted
Flakes, a processed flake with 42% sugar and only 1 g fiber.
No joke, but no yolk!
SAWDUST,
with over 10% of 1 of only 6 required nutrients --fiber-- would qualify
for these endorsements. They know that about 50 nutrients are needed
for human health and the endorsement on the basis of the absence of fat
and cholesterol and the presence of only one (1) nutrient is irresponsible.
The AHA,
America's most reliable source of
heart-health information according to itself,
might fortify its endorsement criteria.
DONATIONS: Until the AHA gets nutrient wise
AND puts all donation financed research free on the Internet, Americans
might consider donating instead to the nutrition dedicated Linus
Pauling Institute (here's
their website). As a second choice --although
they spend more on fund raising than on research-- consider the slightly
more micro-nutrient friendly American Cancer
Society (here's
one of their nutrition pages) and stipulate that
you want donations to be nutrition related. |
|
| Avoiding liver or eggs because
they're high in cholesterol may in fact be bad for the heart and blood
vessels because they contain protein, lecithin, choline, betaine and B
vitamins. Liver is low in fat and about
the highest source
of heart-healthy folic acid, B6, B12, choline and most other B vitamins,
while its betaine (TriMethylGlycine or TMG)
may soon become a heart health food.
Adelle Davis, America's
most celebrated nutritionist according to
her publisher, suggested: "...eggs ... should never be restricted in the
diets of persons with atherosclerosis." In the chapter with
170 references about cholesterol problems she advocates the liberal consumption
of liver. Remember, it is now, 30 years later, pretty well
unanimously agreed that unoxidized cholesterol is not toxic
while oxidized, highly refined, hydrogenated or deep fried --trans--
fats are definitely toxic. It is also agreed that antioxidants
prevent toxic blood fat oxidation. |
Nutrient modification by processing
is little questioned. The same is true for the frequent deficiencies
of vitamin E, omega-3
&
other nutrients in the low fat 'n cholesterol step I &
II diets --AmJClNutr; May 99.
Since the addition of folic acid to US &
Canadian
flour and breakfast cereals in 1998, many such highly processed products
are promoted as sources of folic acid --NEJM;
May 13 '99. While
partial re-supplementation helps, probably 90% of the world eats non supplemented
refined grain and rice products --and nobody replaces the 80 - 100% of
removed magnesium, zinc or vitamin E to name but a few lost nutrients.
Low magnesium alone is linked to 11% of U.S. heart mortality (Int.
J. Epid; 1999).
More-studies-are-needed is
an age-old caveat. While there will never be
certainty, there
are sufficient data to send the optimum
- health case to the jury with instructions that, in life, a
hung jury is not an option. This website is one such analysis.
Here's one by
Nutrition
Science News. Here's an other but technical analysis by >AltMedRev;
'96: 132. Any heart specialist not having read the latter, the
Feb. 16 '99 issue of Circulation about omega-3's and McCully's
homocysteine book has dangerous information deficiencies.
Carotenoids, of which betacarotene
and lycopene are but 2 out of over 600, are best eaten in boiled
carrots, tomatoes and their paste and in all deeply colored fruits
and veggies. A little oil makes them more absorbable.
Here's
some Swiss carotenoid info.
Bone loss (osteoporosis):
eat bone. It is surprising that not all research about low bone density
first
suggests
to eat more bone and/or it's main ingredient, calcium. Think: when your
tire has low air density, you give it air. Lack of vitamin D is also
a proven preventable factor in about ½
of
all hip fractures --JAMA;
'99-4-28. Similarly, in the case of cartilage loss
(osteoarthritis): eat cartilage (also called
glucosamine and chondroitin sulfates) and, a lesser source, soft bone itself.
Biochemically not surprisingly, clinical research
now links bone and cartilage health with artery health and heart disease
survival (Morrison/Schjeide).
P.S. If you can now afford a broken hip or wrist, you could
have afforded the daily 1½
g calcium, ¾
g magnesium & 4-800 IU vitamin D to have
prevented this fracture --or indeed today's bad back. |
| People
and animals store the types of fat they eat.
Feed chickens flax-seed or fish(!), their eggs go omega-3 (and expensive).
Feed people solid fats (shortening, "partially" hydrogenated or heat-damaged
fats) they'll go prematurely stiff; feed them flax and lecithin, they'll
go smooth; feed them fish oil, they'll stay fluid. |
| Eddie's
Muesli: 1/3 no-fat yogurt +1/3 fruits
(currants,
raisins, apple, banana, strawberries, blueberries, cantaloupe, apricot,
prune, papaya) + 1/4 whole
rye (cook 1 min.)
&
oat
kernels,
oat bran & wheat germ (&/or
rolled oats or low-fat granola type cereal) + 1/6 lecithin, flax
seeds, flax oil, sunflower seeds, Brazil
&
walnuts (better oil than pecans). Powdered vitamin C keeps things
fresh. Mix in 1 gal. (4 l) container.
Let sit for 12 hours.
Refrigerate
& eat within 7 days. Good
& delicious breakfast and snack food; increase the fruits and you'll
get a desert.
|